Looking for more? 

We’re just an email away.

Society

7 min

Published March 2026

Tap water, or a glass of glyphosate?

Humans have an unusual relationship with food. We spray crops with chemical pesticides to make sure no other species eats them, and then we eat those pesticides intended to kill other living beings. It is a curious arrangement, and one that extends well beyond the farm, considering a good portion of those chemicals does not stay where they are sprayed.

Pesticides, the heavy artillery of industrial agriculture

Ever since the Green Revolution many farmers use synthetic chemicals to protect their crops from pests and ensure they get the maximum yields. But these products quickly found a way to bypass the farm gate and enter the very veins of our landscape. Rainfall, irrigation and soil drainage quietly carry residues from fields into ditches, streams and rivers. From there they move through entire watersheds and eventually into lakes and groundwater.

Water is an efficient courier, and it rarely checks the contents of the parcel.

Monitoring data across Europe show how widespread this drift has become. According to the European Environment Agency, between 19% and 27% of European rivers contain pesticide concentrations above ecological safety thresholds. Groundwater fares only slightly better, with 11% to 18% of monitored bodies exceeding safe limits. For a resource that supplies much of Europe’s drinking water, that is not a trivial margin.

These results do not stem from a handful of rogue chemicals. Agricultural monitoring programmes test more than 300 pesticide compounds across thousands of rivers and lakes each year. Herbicides such as MCPA and metolachlor regularly appear in samples, along with insecticides like imidacloprid, a member of the neonicotinoid family known to affect insect nervous systems.

The route from field to river is straightforward. Some pesticides dissolve in rainwater and wash directly into nearby streams as surface runoff. Others seep slowly through soil layers and enter groundwater aquifers. We apply these substances to protect a monoculture crop, yet a significant portion embark on a subterranean journey, turning aquifers into a long-term storage facility for synthetic compounds that nature never intended to digest.

Once in rivers, pesticides seldom travel alone. Monitoring frequently reveals mixtures of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides present at the same time. Scientists sometimes describe this as a “chemical cocktail”. Although the phrase sounds almost festive, aquatic insects are unlikely to agree.

The ecological consequences appear quickly. Insecticides developed to disrupt the nervous systems of crop pests also affect aquatic insects, which form the foundation of freshwater food webs. Declines in these populations ripple upwards to fish, amphibians and birds. A river can look perfectly healthy while its life quietly disappears.

Across Europe’s monitoring network, about 23% of surface water bodies exceeded pesticide quality standards in 2023, meaning roughly one in four rivers and lakes failed ecological thresholds designed to protect wildlife. In total, more than 8,800 rivers and 1,500 lakes were analysed between 2018 and 2023, producing one of the most comprehensive pictures yet of pesticide contamination in freshwater systems.

But why should you care if a river 100 miles away is spiked with fungicides? 

Because the water system is a closed loop. What begins as a farmer’s attempt to control a pest often returns to society in another form: degraded ecosystems, endocrine-disrupting chemicals in waterways, and the slow erosion of biodiversity.

Human health concerns arise further downstream. Drinking water treatment plants remove many contaminants before water reaches the tap, but this increasingly requires complex and expensive treatment processes. European regulations set a strict limit of 0.1 micrograms per litre for individual pesticides in groundwater, a threshold intended to keep concentrations extremely low. Monitoring shows that this level is regularly approached or exceeded in agricultural regions.

There is a profound irony in our “cheap” food system. We pay a lower price at the till, but we pay twice over in our water bills to strip out the very chemicals used to grow that “affordable” loaf. Water companies spend millions on carbon filtration and ion exchange to remove pesticides like Metaldehyde or Glyphosate, costs that are passed directly to our communities – not the food or agrochemical companies.

So the public pays twice: once for the chemically assisted harvest and again to remove its residue from the water supply.

But rivers are not the only route these chemicals travel. Some pesticides evaporate after application or attach themselves to dust particles. Once airborne, they can move through the atmosphere and enter clouds. Studies sampling cloud water in France have detected more than 30 different pesticides in cloud droplets, with half the samples exceeding the European drinking-water guideline. Scientists estimate that between 6 and 140 tonnes of pesticides may circulate in clouds over France alone, depending on weather conditions.

Rain then delivers them back to the surface. Monitoring studies regularly detect pesticide residues in rainwater, sometimes finding a dozen or more chemicals in a single rainfall event. In agricultural regions, researchers have reported as many as 35 different pesticides in a single rainwater sample. In effect, pesticides can join the global water cycle: sprayed on land, lifted into the atmosphere, stored briefly in clouds and returned to earth with the next storm.

Soil health is water health.

Part of the problem lies beneath our feet. Healthy soil behaves like a living sponge, filtering water and retaining nutrients. Conventional monocultures often treat soil more like an inert substrate. As soil structure degrades, its ability to absorb and filter water declines. Each rainstorm then becomes, in effect, a transport system carrying fertilisers and pesticides directly into the nearest stream.

Industrial systems rely on these chemicals to prop up tired soil, but in the process, they trade nutrient density for sheer volume. We are drinking the runoff of a system that is essentially on life support.

Reducing this pollution does not require miracle technology. A growing number of farmers are turning to approaches that work with ecosystems rather than against them. Practices associated with Organic-Regenerative Agriculture (healthier soils and natural pest control) can reduce the need for chemical pesticides in the first place. Healthier soils retain more water and nutrients, limiting runoff. Greater biodiversity on farms often keeps pest populations in check without the chemical arms race.

For many farmers, though, pesticides are not simply a choice but a dependency built into the modern agricultural system. Breaking that cycle requires support, and a better understanding of what real (pesticide-free) farming looks like and costs. A food system that rewards soil health and biodiversity rather than sheer chemical efficiency.

European policy already gestures in that direction. The EU’s environmental strategy aims to reduce the risk and use of pesticides by 50% by 2030. Whether that ambition becomes reality will depend largely on how successfully agriculture can shift towards more resilient systems such as organic-regenerative farming.

The evidence itself is straightforward. Pesticides rarely remain where they are applied. Gravity, rain and hydrology see to that. The real question is where the solution lies, and it is not at the tap, but at the root. We need our farming systems to rebuild living soils capable of holding water, nutrients and life itself, to break the cycle.

Farmers spray the field, the rain moves the chemicals, the river carries them on. And eventually, somewhere downstream, we might be drinking a glass of glyphosate.

Sources

European Environment Agency (EEA). (2024). Pesticides in rivers, lakes and groundwater in Europe.
European Environment Agency indicator analysis and monitoring data.
https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/pesticides-in-rivers-lakes-and

European Environment Agency / WISE Freshwater Data. (2023). Pesticides monitoring in European water bodies.
European Water Information System for Europe (WISE).
https://water.europa.eu/freshwater/freshwater/resources/wise-soe-data-collection/pesticides

FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (1996). Control of water pollution from agriculture.
FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 55.
https://www.fao.org/4/w2598e/w2598e07.htm

Silva, V., et al. (2021). Pesticide residues in European agricultural soils – A hidden reality unfolded.
Environmental research study on pesticide persistence and environmental distribution.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7826868/

British Geological Survey. (2023). Modern pesticides found in UK rivers could pose risk to aquatic life.
Environmental monitoring report on pesticide contamination in UK freshwater systems.
https://www.bgs.ac.uk/news/modern-pesticides-found-in-uk-rivers-could-pose-risk-to-aquatic-life/

Beyond Pesticides. (2023). Threatened Waters: Overview of pesticide contamination in waterways.
Environmental monitoring summary and policy analysis.
https://www.beyondpesticides.org/resources/threatened-waters/overview

Environmental Science & Technology. (2017). Pesticides in cloud water at the Puy de Dôme atmospheric observatory (France).
Peer-reviewed study detecting pesticide residues in cloud water and atmospheric transport.

Environmental Monitoring Studies on Rainwater Pesticides.
Multiple studies detecting organophosphate insecticides and other pesticide residues in rainwater samples and atmospheric deposition.

ScienceDirect – Environmental Research. (2025).
Peer-reviewed article analysing environmental transport pathways and ecological impacts of pesticide mixtures in aquatic systems.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004225011228

Written by Emilia Aguirre

Emilia Aguirre

Emilia Aguirre is our Awareness & Advocacy specialist — which means she spends her days asking the uncomfortable questions about how our food is grown, priced, labeled, and sold. She hosts What The Field?!, a podcast packed with stories from the ground, hard-hitting research, and conversations with the people shaping the future of food (whether they like it or not).

Comments

Your email address will not be published.

Share this content:

Keep digging ...

Society

min

The story of Europe’s almonds

Almonds (Prunus dulcis) have been part of Mediterranean agriculture for centuries. They likely arrived in Europe through trade routes from the Middle East and Persia more than 2,000 years ago, flourishing in dry, sunny regions.Today, Spain is by far the largest European producer, responsible for about 70–80% of the EU’s almond output. They are followed by Italy, Portugal, Greece, and France. The main Spanish regions are Andalusia, Murcia, Valencia and Castilla-La Mancha, where the combination of mild winters and hot, dry summers suits the almond tree perfectly.Most almonds are grown on dry, rocky soils, often on hillsides. These conditions are ideal for rain fed cultivation (the traditional Mediterranean method) which relies almost entirely on natural rainfall.The life cycle of an almond treeAn almond tree starts bearing fruit around its third or fourth year, but only reaches full production after seven to eight years. Once mature, it can produce for up to 40 or 50 years.The cycle begins with blooming in late winter, when pink or white flowers appear before the leaves. Pollination is crucial and typically depends on bees. By spring, the fruit (the almond hull) forms around the shell.Harvest usually takes place between August and October, depending on the region and the variety. When the hull dries and splits open, farmers shake the trees, either manually or with mechanical shakers, to make the almonds fall. They are then dried, hulled, and sometimes shelled before storage or sale.After the harvest, the trees are left to rest. They will soon begin to lose their leaves and enter their winter dormancy, which is an ideal moment for pruning.Water and almonds: not always a thirsty cropAlmonds have gained a reputation for being water-intensive, largely because of crops coming from California, which produces around 80% of the world’s almonds and depends heavily on irrigation.But in Europe, the picture is different. Many farmers in Spain, Italy, and Portugal grow almonds under rain fed (dryland) conditions, using the rainfall typical of the Mediterranean climate. This means the trees adapt to water scarcity, producing smaller but more flavourful nuts.In irrigated systems, farmers use drip irrigation or regulated deficit irrigation, providing water only at critical stages like flowering or kernel development. These methods help balance yield stability with water conservation.The almond market: a global storyGlobally, almond production is dominated by California, followed by Australia and the Mediterranean basin. Europe imports the majority of its almonds, mainly from the United States, which accounts for around 60–70% of the almonds consumed in the EU.Spain exports part of its production, especially high-quality local varieties like Marcona and Largueta, which are prized by pastry chefs and confectioners. However, Europe as a whole remains a net importer as demand for almonds continues to outpace local production.While California focuses on high-volume, standardised kernels, European almonds often highlight flavour diversity, traditional varieties, and origin, catering to premium and traceable markets.How to store and enjoy almondsAlmonds keep best when stored in cool, dry, airtight conditions, away from light and humidity. Whole, unpeeled almonds keep their nutrients longer thanks to their natural skin, which contains antioxidants and fibre.Different formats include: With shell: longest shelf life, natural protection. Shelled with skin: rich in fibre and polyphenols, great for snacking. Blanched (skin removed): smoother texture, ideal for baking. Sliced, ground, or roasted: convenient but shorter shelf life,  best consumed within a few months. For longer storage, almonds can be kept in the refrigerator or freezer, which helps preserve their oils and prevent rancidity. Conclusion: a timeless crop with many tastesAlmonds are part of Europe’s agricultural and culinary heritage. Their story is one of adaptation, to climate, to landscape, and to taste.Next, discover four traditional almond recipes from across Europe, from Spanish “Tarta de Santiago” to German Gebrannte Mandeln, French Tarte Amandine and Italian Pizzicotti.  

Read

Society

min

One year on from the floods

On the 29th of October 2024, Valencia suffered one of the worst episodes of flooding in its recent history. A cold drop unleashed torrential rains that triggered floods and overflows of rivers and ravines, causing flash floods with catastrophic effects.  The balance was tragic: 229 deaths, mass destruction of infrastructure, material losses (about 120,000 cars were declared total write-offs), loss of crops, and a major deterioration of agricultural soils, water structures and rural paths.Everything was covered in mud. Thousands of people (especially young people) came from all over Spain and Europe with mops, buckets, and brooms to collect thousands of tons of mud from houses, schools, shops, streets, and cars.How was so much mud generated? Where did it come from? Could it have been avoided?In this article, we’ll explore how the mud was produced and how regenerative agriculture practices can influence soil management, water infiltration and biodiversity, and why they could be key to slowing down the speed of water, thereby reducing mud generation and mitigating disasters such as the 2024 floods in Valencia.Why does rain become so destructive?Heavy rain isn’t directly synonymous with damage. The problem is the speed of the water when it falls to the ground and what it’s able to carry along with it. When water can’t infiltrate the soil, it flows on the surface, causing erosion and turning into mud.The most common causes of low infiltration in agricultural areas are: Compaction by heavy machinery, which seals the soil and reduces its porosity. Absence of plant cover, which leaves the soil exposed to the direct impact of rain and doesn’t act as a natural barrier. Frequent and deep tillage, which destroys biological channels and accelerates structural degradation. To simplify and explain the damage that rainwater can cause, we’ve created the following formula:To reduce the damage that rain can cause, agriculture can respond directly to two of the three variables: speed and load of soil swept away or transported.  According to figures from the European Environment Agency, it is estimated that between 60% and 70% of European soils are degraded. This degradation is due to causes such as erosion, pollution, compaction and loss of organic matter.A hidden problem for most farmers is that they don’t account for the loss of fertile soil on their farms in the same way as other costs that they pay for with money. It’s an invisible but huge cost that causes constant and prolonged damage to their bottom line. What does this mean? Fewer harvests. The lower natural productivity of the soil forces farmers to buy more fertilisers because – after erosion – the soil only serves to keep the tree upright.The ticking time bomb of having tilled soilsAfter the grape harvest, winegrowers in Mediterranean regions (such as Valencia) often till the land in their vineyards. Farmers of almonds, walnuts, and olives that are harvested in September and October follow the same practice.They do this to remove weeds and provide nutrients for autumn and winter. They also do it for aesthetic reasons. Culturally, the image of a well-kept farm is highly valued in rural areas, which is often (wrongly) associated with a weed-free soil. A ploughed field looks tidy and ‘clean’, giving the impression of diligence and care on the part of the farmer. Organic farming, which encourages spontaneous grass to grow among the vines, has in recent decades been associated with the image of an old-fashioned or lazy farmer.In soils de-structured by tillage, the finest and most fundamental particles for fertility, such as clays, remain in suspension and are washed away by rainwater. Meanwhile, larger and less fertile particles, such as sand and gravel, remain in the soil. It’s the combination of clay, organic matter and microbiology that gives rise to clay-humus complexes, an indispensable basis of soil fertility.What happened in October 2024? On recently tilled plots in inland Valencia, the rainwater formed rivers of mud that swept downhill with huge amounts of loose soil. In contrast, on plots with vegetation-covered soil, the water didn’t gather so much speed and could be absorbed (at least partially) by the soil, preventing run-off. The plant layer reduces the impact of raindrops, the roots create pores in the ground, and the organic matter acts as a sponge, allowing much more water to seep in. Healthy soil works as a natural rain buffer: instead of generating flash floods, it retains water, slowly filters it into aquifers, and gradually releases the surplus into rivers without sweeping away so much mud.And what about the compacted soils?We’ve already explained the effects of having tilled land that is too loose. Now we’ll explain the opposite effect, which is when the soil is too compacted. The compaction of agricultural soil can be caused by various factors, the main ones being the continued use of herbicides that prevent the growth of weeds that help de-compact the soil, and the frequent passage of heavy machinery, such as tractors.The peak of the citrus season in Valencia begins in November. In August, September and October, tractors drive between the rows to fumigate crops against pests such as fruit flies, red mites or thrips. This continuous traffic between the rows of trees compacts the soil, making it act as a slippery slope in the event of rain. In citrus farming, which I’m using as an example because it’s the main crop in the Valencia area, the use of chemical herbicides leads to the loss of much of the soil’s microbiology and organic matter. This leaves only clay behind, which is easily compacted by the passage of tractors, thereby preventing water infiltration.  A field with compacted soil drains rainwater too quickly into rivers or ravines, causing flash floods.Soil as the best investment in infrastructureThe cold drop of 29 October 2024 was a disaster that caused irreparable damage. Beyond public policies, warning measures or investments that need to be made, farmers have a duty to care for and repair the largest infrastructure capable of reducing the harmful effects of these torrential rains: the soil on our farms.Failing to regenerate soil means accepting that each extreme event will be worse than the previous one. For us, for our bottom line, and for our surroundings.Organic and regenerative agriculture isn’t a miracle solution and doesn’t prevent these climate events, but it is a solid, proven and replicable agronomic proposal that can restore the resilience that our fields have lost.

Read